Associated Evidence Record
Evidence for
The Words That Sent Keane Back Before the FA
Companion notes
Roy Keane’s 2001 tackle on Alf-Inge Haaland and the later FA sanction
This companion does not retell the feud; it maps which contemporaneous reports, police statements, and later disciplinary coverage actually establish each material claim. It also separates the on-field dismissal and police handling from the later FA punishment triggered by Keane’s own autobiography.
Contemporary match and police documentation
The core on-field fact is securely anchored by contemporaneous match reporting: Keane was sent off for the tackle on Alf-Inge Haaland in the April 2001 Manchester derby at Old Trafford. That fact is repeated in BBC coverage and later explanatory reporting, with the later Sporting News piece functioning as a secondary summary rather than a primary record. What matters for provenance is that the dismissal is not dependent on Keane’s later memoir; it is established by match-era reporting and then carried forward consistently in subsequent accounts. [S1], [S5], [S7]
The police response is documented in separate contemporary reports from the Telegraph and BBC. Those accounts say Greater Manchester Police crime-recorded the tackle after complaints from a small number of witnesses, interviewed both players, and then closed the criminal angle after the Crown Prosecution Service said there was insufficient evidence to prosecute. The reports are independent publications, but they converge on the same official policing outcome and stop short of any criminal charge. [S3], [S5]
Why the later FA punishment stands on a different evidentiary footing
The Football Association sanction is documented separately from the police handling. The Independent reported that Keane was found guilty of two counts of bringing the game into disrepute and received a five-match ban plus a record £150,000 fine, with the sanction subject to appeal and limited to domestic matches. That makes the FA action a disciplinary consequence, not a criminal disposition, and it is sourced to the association’s ruling as reported contemporaneously. [S2]
The disciplinary trigger was Keane’s autobiography, not the 2001 match report itself. The Independent and RTÉ both report that the book described deliberately hurting Haaland, and both preserve the crucial passage in which Keane wrote, 'I'd waited long enough. I hit him hard. The ball was there (I think). Take that.' They also note that he linked the later tackle to the earlier 1997 injury incident. These are strong records of what was published and why it caused trouble, but they remain records of Keane’s own written account rather than independent proof of intent. [S2], [S4], [S1], [S7]
Claim provenance
| Claim | Supporting records | Independence | Qualification |
| C1 | [S1], [S5], [S7] | BBC, sportingnews.com | The sources describe the incident as a tackle and red-card dismissal; they do not need to agree on every descriptive adjective used for the challenge. |
| C2 | [S3], [S5] | The Telegraph, BBC | This reflects police handling described in the reports; it does not imply a prosecution followed. |
| C3 | [S3], [S5] | The Telegraph, BBC | The sources state both parties were interviewed; they do not provide the full contents of those interviews. |
| C4 | [S3], [S5] | The Telegraph, BBC | This is the prosecutorial outcome reported by the police statements; it is not a merits finding about the tackle itself. |
| C5 | [S2] | Independent | The Independent report states the ban and fine were subject to appeal and that the ban applied to domestic matches only. |
| C6 | [S2], [S4] | Independent, RTÉ | The sources attribute the comments to the autobiography and newspaper serialisations; they do not adjudicate the historical truth of the admission beyond reporting the allegation and sanction. |
| C7 | [S2], [S4] | Independent, RTÉ | The quotation is reported in the source text as a book extract; it is included as reported wording, not as an independent verification of intent. |
| C8 | [S1], [S2], [S4], [S7] | BBC, Independent, RTÉ, sportingnews.com | The sources consistently report that Keane connected the later tackle to the earlier injury; they do not establish motive beyond that reported connection. |
Source key
The associated evidence packet contains visible source URLs, source roles and the complete claim ledger.
Archival Sources & Verified Claims
Investigative question
What is firmly documented about Roy Keane’s tackle on Alf-Inge Haaland, the official and police response, and the later disciplinary sanction tied to Keane’s autobiography?
Event boundary
From the 1997 Leeds-United incident referenced in later reporting through the Football Association’s 2002 disciplinary decision and police review of the 2001 tackle; includes only the tackle, its immediate football consequences, the police/CPS handling, and the FA sanction tied to Keane’s published comments.
Sources
Source 1 — Keane heads trio in the dock
Role: stage0 contemporary reporting
Independent source group: BBC
URL: https://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/eng_prem/1290901.stm
Immediate match report on the red card, tackle description, and Keane-Haaland background.
Limit: Contemporary football reporting; it does not cover the later police/CPS outcome or FA punishment from 2002.
Source 2 — Keane receives five‑match ban and record fine
Role: stage0 contemporary reporting
Independent source group: Independent
Primary source for the FA disciplinary outcome and the autobiography-linked charges.
Limit: Reports the FA hearing and punishment; the article also contains interpretive framing and book quotations that should be treated as reported text.
Source 3 — Police questioned Keane over Haaland tackle
Role: stage0 contemporary reporting
Independent source group: The Telegraph
URL: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/3033472/Police-quizzed-Keane-over-Haaland-tackle.html
Police/CPS handling of the tackle and the later review prompted by the autobiography.
Limit: A news report of police statements, not an original police file.
Source 4 — Tackle revelation lands Keane in trouble
Role: stage0 contemporary reporting
Independent source group: RTÉ
URL: https://www.rte.ie/sport/soccer/2002/0813/166156-keane/
Irish reporting on the autobiography serialisation, the FA’s review posture, and the earlier rivalry context.
Limit: Uses quoted excerpts from the book and reported claims from The Times/The Sun; those quotations are not independently authenticated here.
Source 5 — Police questioned Keane over tackle
Role: stage0 contemporary reporting
Independent source group: BBC
URL: https://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/2219902.stm
BBC match and police follow-up report confirming the tackle, complaints, crime recording, and CPS decision.
Limit: Does not itself contain the later FA sanction.
Source 7 — Roy Keane vs. Erling Haaland beef, explained: Revisiting infamous dirty tackle
Role: investigative journalism
Independent source group: sportingnews.com
Later explanatory sports feature summarizing the historical dispute and the 2001 tackle.
Limit: Secondary retrospective piece; useful for context, not as the sole authority for contested details.
Claim ledger
| Item | Claim | Support | Qualification |
| Claim 1 | Roy Keane was sent off for a tackle on Alf-Inge Haaland in a Manchester derby at Old Trafford in April 2001. | Keane heads trio in the dock, Police questioned Keane over tackle, Roy Keane vs. Erling Haaland beef, explained: Revisiting infamous dirty tackle | The sources describe the incident as a tackle and red-card dismissal; they do not need to agree on every descriptive adjective used for the challenge. |
| Claim 2 | Greater Manchester Police crime-recorded the tackle after receiving complaints from a small number of witnesses. | Police questioned Keane over Haaland tackle, Police questioned Keane over tackle | This reflects police handling described in the reports; it does not imply a prosecution followed. |
| Claim 3 | Police interviewed Roy Keane and Alf-Inge Haaland after the incident. | Police questioned Keane over Haaland tackle, Police questioned Keane over tackle | The sources state both parties were interviewed; they do not provide the full contents of those interviews. |
| Claim 4 | The Crown Prosecution Service decided there was insufficient evidence to prosecute Keane over the tackle. | Police questioned Keane over Haaland tackle, Police questioned Keane over tackle | This is the prosecutorial outcome reported by the police statements; it is not a merits finding about the tackle itself. |
| Claim 5 | The Football Association found Keane guilty of two counts of bringing the game into disrepute and imposed a five-match ban and a record £150,000 fine. | Keane receives five‑match ban and record fine | The Independent report states the ban and fine were subject to appeal and that the ban applied to domestic matches only. |
| Claim 6 | The FA’s charges were tied to comments Keane made in his autobiography about deliberately hurting Haaland. | Keane receives five‑match ban and record fine, Tackle revelation lands Keane in trouble | The sources attribute the comments to the autobiography and newspaper serialisations; they do not adjudicate the historical truth of the admission beyond reporting the allegation and sanction. |
| Claim 7 | In the autobiography, Keane wrote, 'I'd waited long enough. I hit him hard. The ball was there (I think). Take that.' | Keane receives five‑match ban and record fine, Tackle revelation lands Keane in trouble | The quotation is reported in the source text as a book extract; it is included as reported wording, not as an independent verification of intent. |
| Claim 8 | In the same book, Keane linked the 2001 tackle to a 1997 incident in which he had ruptured his cruciate knee ligament in a challenge involving Haaland. | Keane heads trio in the dock, Keane receives five‑match ban and record fine, Tackle revelation lands Keane in trouble, Roy Keane vs. Erling Haaland beef, explained: Revisiting infamous dirty tackle | The sources consistently report that Keane connected the later tackle to the earlier injury; they do not establish motive beyond that reported connection. |
Evidence assessment
The captured sources support a narrower factual account than the sensational working title: Keane was sent off for a late tackle on Alf-Inge Haaland in April 2001; police recorded the incident and CPS did not prosecute; and the FA later imposed a five-match ban and record fine after Keane’s autobiography comments about the tackle. The sources do not establish a new criminal conviction, and they only support Keane’s alleged premeditation as a reported self-description in his book, not as an independently proven fact.
